
- Image by wstera2 via Flickr
I’m very disappointed in the disingenuous way our president continues to wage war on the nation’s banks. Yesterday, he unveiled a new tax on these institutions meant to recapture the money spent on TARP. As reported by NPR, the President lays out a compelling story:
“[These banks]…owe their continued existence to the American people, folks who have not been made whole and who continue to face real hardship in this recession. We want our money back and we’re going to get it.”
In other words, if the US government hadn’t made TARP money available to these banks, they would have gone bankrupt.
As you know by now, this is a complete and utter lie. Almost all of the TARP recipients were forced to take the money so the few banks that actually did need the funds wouldn’t be stigmatized and experience a run.
And, as I mentioned before, these same banks that were forced to take the money were also forced to pay interest on it.
But, you know what; it wouldn’t be so bad if he were merely lying. Frankly, that’s par for the Obama administration.
What gets me is the hypocrisy. Check out this quote:
“My determination to achieve this goal is only heightened when I see reports of massive profits and obscene bonuses at some of [these] firms”
Which firms are those, Mr. Obama? Do they include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126161634214403629.html?mg=com-wsj (subscription required)
Fannie, Freddie Disclose Big Jump in CEOs’ Pay
“The companies on Thursday disclosed new pay packages under which Fannie CEO Michael Williams and Freddie CEO Charles (Ed) Haldeman Jr. will earn as much as $6 million a year, including bonuses, well above their current terms. The packages came with the blessing of the Treasury, which has pumped a combined total of about $112 billion of capital into the companies over the past year to keep them in operation, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA, which regulates the companies.”
That’s right. We pumped $112 billion of capital into these companies and their CEOs are getting big jumps in pay. By the way, when were those approved? Oh, that’s right, Christmas Eve. Nice transparency.
Well, hey, do Freddie and Fannie have to repay the $112 billion they got?
Answer: no. Despite being the overwhelming majority underwriter of the horrible loans that started this mess. Classy move, Obama.
Oh, but Obama has some suggestions for the banks who do have to repay taxpayer money:
“What I’d say to these executives is this: Instead of sending a phalanx of lobbyists to fight this proposal or employing an army of lawyers and accountants to help evade the fee, I suggest you might want to consider simply meeting your responsibilities. And I’d urge you to cover the costs of the rescue not by sticking it to your shareholders or your customers or fellow citizens with the bill but by rolling back bonuses for top earners and executives.”
I literally swore (sorry, Love!) last night as I listened to a supposedly educated man, and leader of the free world, make this statement.
Meeting their responsibilities? What responsibilities are those? The responsibility, under your party’s Community Reinvestment Act to make loans to people who can’t afford them? The responsibility to amp up those loans when a Democrat-led Senate threatened to sue the banks for not loaning enough in the 1990′s?
And where are they going to get the money to pay these fines? From their customers and shareholders and fellow citizens. THEY HAVE NO OTHER SOURCE OF MONEY!!
Oh, except the Treasury, when it’s forced on them.
Mr. Obama, please stop your populist temper tantrum, quit speaking out of both sides of your mouth and get down to the fundamental job government should be doing: ensuring a free market and free information for all participants.





Good grief! And it’s okay–it sounds like you had a good reason for swearing.
Nice write-up. I work for one of the “big banks” (US BANK) and we were the first to pay back our TARP funds. We actually made a profit when all the other banks were failing. Our CEO can’t stand this administration and he’s made many semi-jokes about the government getting involved.
@Heidi: Thanks, Love.
@Ty: Really? I can’t imagine how your CEO does it. Has the way you do your job been affected by the government intervention?